It doesn’t matter if you’re pro-life or pro-choice. If you love the Dobbs decision or if you hate it. There’s one thing that we all need to agree on: students need to continue learning about Roe v. Wade. 

To give some context, for 50 years Roe v. Wade was a precedent in the Supreme Court. It established that the 14th Amendment’s “right to privacy” gave women the constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. But last year in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, citing judicial error. Their reasoning: the Constitution makes no direct reference to abortion. 

Accordingly, the College Board nixed Roe v. Wade from the AP Government and Politics curriculum, as the case no longer serves precedent. The College Board has confirmed that questions about Roe v. Wade will not appear on the 2023 AP exam.

“The full set of legal implications related to the Dobbs decision and the status of Roe remain uncertain and are likely to evolve. Because AP Exam questions are drafted years before they are administered, future questions about the role of this case as precedent are at risk of becoming inaccurate and confusing to students,” the College Board wrote in a statement on their website.

While I agree that Roe v. Wade no longer sets a precedent, and it should not be instructed as a precedent case, that doesn’t mean we should just stop teaching it. That would overlook a critical moment of women’s history from classrooms, and enforce a tradition of erasure over truth. 

“We can never learn the truth of our country’s history if certain facts and events are missing. Roe v. Wade was a turning point in the Women’s Rights Movement, by giving women the liberty to choose whether or not to have an abortion,” said AP Government and Politics student, senior Sam Scalia. “We cannot expect future generations to make logical and ethical decisions about women’s bodies, if they aren’t fully knowledgeable about what has happened in the past.” 

Students need to understand America’s history, and yes, that includes women’s history. Ignoring Roe v. Wade would create a gaping hole in a student’s understanding of American politics, thus cultivating ignorance around an already hot-pocket, misinformation-prone issue. 

“Even though it’s overturned it is still important to study it because students would learn about both the reasons for the original decision and, now, the new majority opinion for overturning it. Not studying it fosters ignorance about both sides of the issue,” said AP Government and Politics teacher Bill Kaiser. 

AP Government and Politics teachers can choose to continue teaching Roe v. Wade, they just have to do so in a different way. For instance, teachers may use the case to explain AP Government curriculum concepts about implied and explicit powers and the meaning of the 14th Amendment’s “right to privacy.” Or, they can instruct the case in the judicial review unit of the class in order to demonstrate complex topics like judicial activism and restraint.

“Roe v. Wade is an important case now because it was recently overturned, and that’s an example of judicial activism. Normally, a conservative dominated court would be more cautious about overturning precedent. That’s called judicial restraint,” said Kaiser. 

My personal beliefs on abortion are beside the point. Your personal beliefs on abortion are beside the point. What matters is that Roe v. Wade belongs in the classroom, and there is still a place for it in the curriculum. 

Teachers have a choice. Make time in class to encourage students to learn beyond what’s required. Raise our future leaders to recognize our history, not ignore it. Don’t erase our stories.